logo

Global power intervention in trade war

Uday Bhan MishraThe trade war between America and China has shocked each other with reliance on each other in the field of business in the world. Trade strategies of many countries have collapsed. This situation is not beneficial for anyone, so it needs to be resolved as soon as possible to get out of this. Conflicts of ideology along with trade war are also going on together, and because of this, the concept of development is also in dispute, because it is not certain who believes development, cooperatives or protectionism.It is important to note that nations around the world are in dire need of discussions on these crises of the modern era. Today's crisis is more dangerous than before, because the weapons have changed, by putting more tax in the past, its competitors were not allowed to move forward, but now protectionism is used, which is more destructive.With the establishment of international institutions, global norms were changed, where free flow of goods and services was given priority. Due to this trade war, personalized consumerism is now dramatically affected. To reduce this side effect of the commerce business, you will have to consider. I agree that in the exchange process, the terms of the benefits can not be the same. But not being equal does not mean that efforts should not be made, because the balance in trade is related to the domestic economic policy.Instead of short-term perspectives to protect each other for the sake of protecting national interest, we should think broadly about structural reforms. The global which is today is related to the local, therefore, nations should give priority to business policy in the form of electoral issues. Corporate tax reforms require a synergy in thinking and action, so that the world can be harmoniously benefiting in the business. Apart from this, Mahinda Rajapaksa has been a strong supporter of India and anti-India from the very beginning. China had helped Mahinda Rajapaksa in ending the LTTE. In return, Mahinda Rajapakse gave China many concessions in Sri Lanka. In Sri Lanka, the civil war with the LTTE was completely demolished infrastructures, roads, electricity, bridges etc. China strengthened the infrastructure there and provided a lot of loan to Sri Lanka. In return, China acquired a large amount of land in Sri Lanka. In Sri Lanka, China made the port named Habitatota. Sri Lanka made this harbor with loans from China. When Sri Lanka could not repay this debt, China pressed that Sri Lanka give this port to China.There was some slightness in America and China, which was seen in Argentina, which is expected to have some impact on the ongoing tension between the two. We should also not forget that the trade deficit is increasing and the import is decreasing. It is important to add here that the balance of trade can not be found with working measures.As with the radical nationalist sentiments, the purpose of national security can not be met, unless we ignore the policies and reforms of immigration on a large scale. Similarly, in the case of trade war, each country is feeling its heat - from Taiwan's semiconductor industry to the Indian agricultural sector - can not ignore the criticism of behavior that causes any problems. With globalization, business crisis technology is going in a new area of ​​war. This will basically change global relations and also demand open communication and coordination between different shareholders.Information theft and hardware designed with the intention of intentions are the weapons of this new war. Technology and 5G are basically redefining the power sector and the data here is the new currency. From developed to developing countries, now it is interested in models of smart cities where there is an app for every problem. Cyber ​​espionage has emerged as a non-traditional security dimension.Huawei's technical expertise gave Apple Inc. an opportunity for expansion to benefit in market share. Its grand vision of expansion was supported by China's blue chip companies and government. At the same time, the United States requested that Canada arrest Huawei's Chief Financial Officer Wenzhou Meng, and in addition to announcing the war on China's business community, the world has to push towards another disaster.Undoubtedly, the corporate world needs accountability and transparency. But writing on the wall is clear that the US is going to be behind the Huawei only because of the Chinese company's success in the marketing of 5G technologies. Even in the past when the Bank of America or Barclays had lifted the sanctions, the responsibility was fixed at the organizational level rather than the individual. One can not ignore these issues because such incidents have also worked on putting the soil on trade negotiations.There was some slightness in America and China, which was seen in Argentina, which is expected to have some impact on the ongoing tension between the two. We should also not forget that the trade deficit is increasing and the import is decreasing. It is important to add here that the balance of trade can not be found with working measures.As with the radical nationalist sentiments, the purpose of national security can not be met, unless we ignore the policies and reforms of immigration on a large scale. Similarly, in the case of trade war, each country is feeling its heat - from Taiwan's semiconductor industry to the Indian agricultural sector - can not ignore the criticism of behavior that causes any problems. With globalization, business crisis technology is going in a new area of ​​war. This will basically change global relations and also demand open communication and coordination between different shareholders.Information theft and hardware designed with the intention of intentions are the weapons of this new war. Technology and 5G are basically redefining the power sector and the data here is the new currency. From developed to developing countries, now it is interested in models of smart cities where there is an app for every problem. Cyber ​​espionage has emerged as a non-traditional security dimension.Huawei's technical expertise gave Apple Inc. an opportunity for expansion to benefit in market share. Its grand vision of expansion was supported by China's blue chip companies and government. At the same time, the United States requested that Canada arrest Huawei's Chief Financial Officer Wenzhou Meng, and in addition to announcing the war on China's business community, the world has to push towards another disaster.Undoubtedly, the corporate world needs accountability and transparency. But writing on the wall is clear that the US is going to be behind the Huawei only because of the Chinese company's success in the marketing of 5G technologies. Even in the past when the Bank of America or Barclays had lifted the sanctions, the responsibility was fixed at the organizational level rather than the individual. One can not ignore these issues because such incidents have also worked on putting the soil on trade negotiations.Legal challenges are increasing in both the US and China. In these countries, commercial enmity is hampering for private sector and small businesses looking for so-called net profits. On third, it is impossible to give timely payment to the workers and workers on the due payments. Trump and Shi are witness to the rapid recession, and sadly the efforts of both of them are inadequate. Due to this uncertainty and between turmoil, from pharmaceuticals to engineering, companies are trying to shift themselves to better returns and low-risk areas.There is no win in the business crisis, lack of political will and the waste of the country's economic resources engage both active and passively. Many other issues, such as poverty, non-equality, climate change, which are affecting all the countries, have to be tried at the global level together for achieving them..